To illustrate how badly Microsoft Windows is designed, Australian IT magazine has a humorous article regarding Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's troubleshooting session for a friend. Apparently Ballmer was attending a wedding and the bride's father had asked him to troubleshoot his Windows PC at home. Of course, Ballmer volunteered to check it out because he loves the OS so much… and after two days gave up. He called in the engineers at Microsoft headquarters and together they found the system crippled by malware and corrupted settings, some of which were irreparable.
Many distributions of Mac OS X come with Postfix installed, which make for great mail servers. However, Apple added a new twist to its UNIX backend with the addition of its own pseudo-replacement for cron, called launchd. This causes a minor, yet fatal error with Postfix on Tiger. If you use the preinstalled Postfix or roll your own, you may encounter this in your mail.log:
fatal: open lock file pid/master.pid: unable to set exc
lusive lock: Resource temporarily unavailable. To correct this you need to mod a system setting file provided by Apple, and the solution has been posted on chxo.com. I must say, killing launchd via HUP doesn't seem to break my system but your experience may be different than mine, so please exercise caution and restart the box if you're unsure of what you're doing.
This is a touchy subject for some because there is a valid argument in support of GUI apps for web development (emphasis by me). Some people say that designers should use the GUI solely and that allows them the freedom to create unhindered. The other side of that argument are the support and programming issues. I'm a web designer who does a lot of development, i.e. coding and debugging. When I open up the HTML that a lot of these so-called designers present from FrontPage, GoLive or Dreamweaver, I want to puke. A friend of mine once told me that my code for one of his sites was too clean and made it difficult for him to manage (I used straight CSS/XHTML, no tables) as a standard web designer. He ended up re-editing the thing in Dreamweaver and the HTML contained dozens of redundant
tags all over the place and silly tables which goofed it all up. Under my breath, I muttered how a real web designer worth his mettle should know how to code this stuff.
GUI apps like Dreamweaver are fine for a web developer to do basic checking of bracket matching and layout preview. Even then, a lot of CSS layouts don’t preview correctly and you have to resort to using your web browser. Thus, the only real benefit of today’s GUI editors is:
- Layout preview
- Site template management
Beyond that, a non-techy web designer is better off using something like iWeb which is completely GUI driven and cranks out surprisingly valid XHTML. Once you get into serious development with a team, however, you really need to learn how to code and break down your design with CSS. Otherwise, you’re just making it difficult to interface with your programming peers.
GUI apps don’t take well at all with the point-and-click editing that most people do, and result in some insanely botched, if not laughingly valid code. Below are some hilarious examples of what these apps spew out.
10% discount in the bar. Excludes alcohol, tax and tip.
Nested font tags, something GUIs are notorious for:
A great place to see.
The worst of all! Redundant, nested font tags, links to local Microsoft Windows paths (won’t even work on the Internet), inconsistent inline font style usage, spaces in URLs, AAAAAAUGH!
Our instructors are professionals. Members of the team work well together.